CDW Corp. chief marketing officer Mark Gambill reflects on the lengthy process that culminated in the hiring of new lead agency Ogilvy & Mather this week. In an interview with senior reporter Andrew McMains, Gambill discusses what set Ogilvy apart from fellow finalists JWT and The Martin Agency, why clients increasingly are producing what agencies pitch in reviews and how business has become “less bad” for CDW, a provider of technology products and services to businesses, governmental bodies and schools.
Adweek: What factors prompted this review?
Mark Gambill: I think it’s healthy to take a look at all of your vendor relationships and pull back. When you get into something and you’re in the middle of it, you tend to not be able to pull back and have perspective. One of the things that I was able to do coming into the company three-and-a-half years ago was to take a look at all our relationships. And the relationship that we had with JWT was very good on a number of levels. But I felt like there were some areas where we could improve. So, we worked with them to try and realize some of these things and while they did a nice job and they showed improvement, we felt like it’s in our company’s best interest to just see what else is out there [and get] some fresh thinking, some fresh perspective.
AW: What led you to The Martin Agency?
MG: We used a consultant [Jones Lundin Beals] and we went through a very detailed process of trying to understand what it is we wanted to accomplish and who out there had the strength to be able to deliver that. And The Martin Agency had a fantastic team. They came across very well. It was just a matter of seeing who else is out there and they have a very good reputation.
AW: Was this more a strategic pitch or did you have agencies show creative ideas as well?
MG: Soup to nuts.
AW: What made Ogilvy stand out?
MG: We got down to four, then three finalists and every one of them had pieces of what they were doing that was very powerful. One of them might have been in their ability to understand the digital landscape, another one might have been in their ability to come up with a big idea. But what we felt with Ogilvy is that they put it all together. They had a very sound strategy. The foundation of the thinking was very good. They did very good due diligence in terms of the research. And they came up with a creative idea that we think will have resonance and it will apply very well to our business model.
AW: Were you looking to realize cost efficiencies in doing this consolidation? You’re going from several agencies essentially down to one main agency, correct?
MG: For the most part. There are still a couple of other agencies that we work with on some of the items. But it wasn’t really a cost consolidation that was driving it. Moreover, it was just getting that consistency of message, of brand, of approach to the marketplace. [We were] really trying to hone and articulate our value proposition and how we presented it in the marketplace, in an integrated fashion and strategically.
AW: How likely is it that what Ogilvy pitched will be produced?
MG: We’re doing some internal checking right now. They’ll do some more testing on it. There’s a good possibility that that will become what comes out into the marketplace. We’ve got a little bit of time here because we’re in the midst of a transition going into the new fiscal year. So, we are giving good due diligence to this so we make sure it is what we think it is.