Marketing: Mother May I?

Headshot of T.L. Stanley

Christmas 2009 was coming, but Lionel headquarters wasn’t sure how much Santa would be bringing. They’d just cut the ribbon on the model-train company’s first retail shop in New York’s Rockefeller Center. Behind the plate-glass windows employees had built a 1:48 scale city, complete with Christmas trees, piled-up snow and, of course, model trains (going so far as to include a New York City subway among them.) The location was unbeatable, but Lionel had done no advertising. After all, the recession was in full effect. Execs hoped the locomotives would stoke interest in the 109-year-old brand, and maybe help sell some of
Lionel’s new, lower-priced train sets aimed at toddlers and pre-schoolers.

But as things turned out, Lionel’s train was an express. Shoppers came in droves, snapping up not only the $60 and $230 starter layouts, but just about everything else from box cars to track sets. Even the prized CC2 locomotive (a 16-wheeled monster priced at $1,800) flew off the shelves.

But what about that recession? Lionels’ management could draw but one conclusion: Consumers may still be pinching pennies, but when it comes to their kids, the wallets still come out. “Lionel trains are a big-box gift—and they’re not cheap,” says William Finkel, Lionel’s manager of business affairs. “But they’re still not a flat-screen TV or a videogame system. It’s a toy for the whole family, and it’s [a gift that’s] still going to be around decades from now.”

Finkel’s not the only marketer in a position to be optimistic. Indeed, despite the enduring effects of a recession that’s supposedly over, parents are still shelling out money on their children despite double-digit unemployment and ongoing mortgage defaults. And that’s good news for any brand that makes toys, clothes, candy, or just about anything else an American kid could want. According to the Winter 2010 Cassandra Report, while 71 percent of parents say they have been personally affected by the recession, 90 percent of them say they’re spending less on themselves so they can spend more on their offspring.

“You feel less guilty when you’re buying for your kids,” explains Melissa Lavigne, director of trend consulting for Creative Artists Agency’s Intelligence Group, the authors of the study. “If I splurge on myself during this time, it almost feels immoral. But if it’s for my kids, it seems more reasonable.”

It certainly seems to be a trend, at least. When the economic upheaval shook the country in 2008, American families pulled the purse strings tight, spending an average 4.3 percent less over the prior year on apparel, shoes and accessories, according to the U.S. Labor Department’s Consumer Expenditure Survey released last fall. But that reduction didn’t significantly impact kids under 16, for whom spending remained constant. And while spending on adult vices like cigarettes and alcohol decreased, spending on entertainment increased $144 per family, to $2,835, with the majority of that going to toys, hobbies and playground equipment, the Labor Department said.

The child-friendly spending trend didn’t just show up in government data; you can see it on the earnings statements of the companies that make kid stuff. First-quarter sales for Mattel were up 12 percent over the same period last year. Hasbro’s Q1 figures show double-digit increases in girls’ toys (up 16 percent) and pre-school products (up 18 percent.)

Neil Friedman, president of Mattel Brands (whose Barbie sales jumped 4 percent in the U.S. last year), speculates that many parents are seeking to shield their kids from the withering effects of a recession that everyone’s sick of hearing about. “Parents typically want to make sure the child isn’t feeling the same kind of stress and difficulty they are,” Friedman posits.
“They want to keep the kids’ lives as normal as possible, so they’ll buy for the kids when they won’t buy for themselves. That might be a 99-cent Hot Wheels car or a $9 Barbie, but the play value makes it worthwhile to the parent.”

@TLStanleyLA T.L. Stanley is a senior editor at Adweek, where she specializes in consumer trends, cannabis marketing, meat alternatives, pop culture, challenger brands and creativity.
Publish date: April 25, 2010 © 2020 Adweek, LLC. - All Rights Reserved and NOT FOR REPRINT