As the cable TV industry gathers this week in Los Angeles for its annual convention, the theme is convergence with Hollywood and Silicon Valley. That sounds promising, but even as cable celebrates recent upbeat earnings and success in selling telephone and data delivery, questions linger about the future.
It’s not just competitors from satellite and telco TV; it’s the issue of who will control the TV screen as network content converges with online, interactive and other sources of data.
“I don’t think of this as a threat,” said Kyle McSlarrow, president and CEO of the National Cable & Telecommunications Assn., which runs the annual Cable Show. “The threat is to stick our head in the sand and not recognize the innovation that is taking place around us.”
McSlarrow said cable TV is involved in “a massive amount of experimentation” that this week will involve public and private discussions with leaders in the tech and showbiz industries.
“People are doing a lot more collaboration,” he said, “and it has intensified in the last year in a way that was almost nonexistent a couple years before that.”
Although the huge investment in technology has positioned cable as the primary provider to homes and businesses, that doesn’t assure control over lucrative future growth. One reason cable is nervous is the FCC’s push for “net neutrality,” which means opening their systems to all. So as they invest to improve the speed at which content moves, they could speed their own demise.
“The more speed you get, the more you make it easier for somebody to do Over the Top video,” said analyst and THR columnist Larry Gerbrandt, principal in Media Valuation Partners.
Over the Top video means competitors offering bundles of channels, the Internet, interactive services and more that turn cable into little more than a common carrier.
“You will have to give everybody equal and open access even if they are sticking it to you,” Gerbrandt said.
Said Wall Street analyst Harold Vogel of Vogel Capital Management in New York, “There is valid concern that cable TV is at risk of being commoditized in a certain way.
He believes that Comcast moved to acquire NBC Universal to avoid that threat by expanding into programming, which should provide unique products and services to sell.
“Comcast did this out of concern their base business is no longer expanding,” Vogel said. “I don’t believe they did it out of strength; they did it out of weakness.”
Chairman and CEO Brian Roberts declined an interview request but will lead off the Cable Show on Tuesday when he is interviewed by producer Peter Chernin. Roberts will appear the next day on a panel moderated by former FCC chairman Michael Powell alongside Time Warner’s Jeff Bewkes, CBS’ Leslie Moonves and DreamWorks’ Stacey Snider.
They are among a bevy of big names from Hollywood, Silicon Valley, Wall Street and Washington on tap this week. On Thursday, FCC chairman Julius Genachowski will give the keynote, followed by a panel that includes WME’s Ari Emanuel, Sony’s Amy Pascal, Cablevision’s Thomas Rutledge and Twitter’s Evan Williams, moderated by Showtime’s Matthew Blank.
“The genius of the industry historically has been to figure out a way to build a business model that integrates a lot of innovation within the industry and combines with the innovators from outside,” McSlarrow said.
Gerbrandt is skeptical because he has seen satellite then telcos take market share.
“The cable industry has a history of not reacting until their backs are against the wall, and they are losing body parts,” Gerbrandt said. “They’re not at that point yet.”